Zohair123 wrote:
One every 5 teenagers is a small proportion, it's smaller than a quarter. A states that the jobs were inaccessible to the high proportion of the teenagers living in the cities. Doesn't it make this option ambiguous, since we don't know how many teenagers live in the city as a total compared to teenagers living elsewhere? Nothing is mentioned about cities either in the argument.
I chose D because first, it specifies a small percentage (which I thought was commensurate to a small proportion) and second, it mentions the reason why they failed to find a job.
Can someone clarify where I misinterpreted the options, or the question, for that matter?
I think you assumed incorrectly here. 1/5 is a ratio that's given to us. It's your assumption that 1/5 OF something is small. Since we aren't told OF what we can't assume this is a small or big percentage. In fact, I'd wager that the paradox highlighted in the passage points to this being a considerable number.
In regards to D, a small percentage doesn't really impact the paradox. We need to resolve or explain this. A small percentage still means the majority of students were out of jobs.