Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O
[#permalink]
09 Dec 2018, 12:37
2
Expert Reply
2
Bookmarks
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilization 2,500 years ago has focused on the change in meteorological conditions favorable to subsistence crops. Much of this research, though, has overlooked the role that changing geography, most notably the course of rivers, played. The Coatzacoalcos River, the main river passing through La Venta, could have had notable tributaries diverted as a result of climate change, leading not only to severe flooding in certain areas, but also to a lack of sufficient water for subsistence crops planted near the erstwhile alluvial plain. Such a view, however, fails to account for the resilience of a people capable of transferring crops and moving settlements as need be. What was more likely responsible for the downfall of the Olmec civilization was internal dissent brought on by ecological change, since a leadership unable to control events was likely to be perceived as weak. Without the central governance needed to adapt crop subsistence patterns, the Olmec likely became a collection of feuding clans and within a few generations all but disappeared.
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
56% (02:35) correct
44% (02:54) wrong based on 104 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Which of the following, if true, would best undermine the theory the author of the passage provides for the sudden disappearance of the Olmec?
A. Much of the flooding that resulted came not from any diverted tributaries but by rainfall that intensified over the course of a decade. B. Not all the major subsistence crops were planted along the Coatzacoalcos River. C. Internal dissent was long offered as a theory for the disappearance of the Mayans, but in recent years there is near unanimous agreement that the disappearance was mostly caused by a meteorological phenomenon. D. The Olmec split into two groups that warred persistently for several decades before both succumbed to meteorological changes that made settlement of the area virtually impossible. E. The Olmec leadership successfully relocated settlements near one of the new tributaries of Coatzacoalcos, yet years of constant flooding precluded the growth of subsistence crops.
Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
64% (01:11) correct
36% (01:14) wrong based on 107 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Which of the following best describes the primary function of the third sentence (“ The Coatzacoalcos . . . plain”)?
A. To call into question information mentioned in the sentence that immediately precedes it B. To introduce the role meteorological conditions played in the change in crop subsistence patterns C. To highlight evidence offered up by most scholarship on the disappearance of the Olmec D. To provide a specific example supporting a hypothesis that differs from that mentioned in the first sentence E. To indicate how major geographical changes affected the Olmec’s ability to govern effectively
Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
Question Stats:
53% (01:11) correct
47% (01:09) wrong based on 95 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
For the following question, consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.
Which of the following is an assumption the author of the passage makes?
A. The crops displaced by the flooding of the Coatzacoalcos River would not be viable if replanted in areas unaffected by flooding. B. Adapting crop subsistence involves some level of central governance. C. Feuding clans are not capable of sustaining a viable population in the wake of ecological catastrophe.
Re: Most scholarship into the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilizati
[#permalink]
05 May 2021, 23:20
7
Question #1 : Most scholarship into the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilization 2,500 years ago has focused on the change in meteorological conditions favorable to subsistence crops. Much of this research, though, has overlooked the role that changing geography, most notably the course of rivers, played. The Coatzacoalcos River, the main river passing through La Venta, could have had notable tributaries diverted...
The first sentence has presented a scenario where disappearance of the Olmec civilization is considered to be attributed to change in meteorological conditions. The second sentence mentions a different hypothesis related to changes in geography. The thirds sentence(which the question refers to) is included to support the second sentence which is a different hypothesis than the first sentence. Hence correct answer is choice D
Question #2 :
Choice #1 : Such a view, however, fails to account for the resilience of a people capable of transferring crops and moving settlements as need be.. This sentence in the passage suggests Choice #1 is wrong.
Choice #2 : Without the central governance needed to adapt crop subsistence patterns,.... Choice #2 is correct.
Choice #3 :... the Olmec likely became a collection of feuding clans and thus within a few generations all but disappeared. Choice #3 is correct.
Question #3 :
Author's theory for sudden disappearance of the Olmec is based on the fact that the Olmec lacked a central control like governance or a leadership who can help them. Any option choice which mentions Olmec had good leadership would undermine author's theory. Option choice E undermines the author's theory by mentioning the presence of a leadership in Olmec civilization.
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O
[#permalink]
15 Dec 2018, 05:23
Hi Carcass,
Took 5:52 mins , is this timing more ?
For question 2: First people mentioned that it is due to meteorological change and then the actual reason was river flooding. Since the first reason is changed by the latter and for the same option D is correct. Is my understanding is correct ?
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O
[#permalink]
15 Dec 2018, 16:42
Expert Reply
The timing is fairly accurate
As for the second question, the reason is pretty straight
Quote:
Much of this research, though, has overlooked the role that changing geography, most notably the course of rivers, played. The Coatzacoalcos River, the main river passing through La Venta, could have had notable tributaries diverted as a result of climate change, leading not only to severe flooding in certain areas, but also to a lack of sufficient water for subsistence crops planted near the erstwhile alluvial plain. Such a view, however, fails to account for the resilience of a people capable of transferring crops
The highlighted portions of the text above clearly show you that what is in the middle is an example to show something.
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O
[#permalink]
19 Dec 2018, 12:20
Question 2: I chose B. Nevertheless, I misread the first sentence. According to the passage, it seems that the first sentence mentioned that scholars have always been interested in studying favorable meteorological changes, while the sentence in question is an example of unfavorable meteorological changes? Still confused why A cannot be an option for question 3.
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O
[#permalink]
22 Dec 2018, 07:45
Hi
can you please help me to understand why A is wrong for 3rd question? THe author states that "The Coatzacoalcos River ... could have had notable tributaries diverted as a result of climate change, leading ... to severe flooding in certain areas..." Thus the author considers that floodings affected crops. Why not to plant crop somewhere else then? Probably, crop could not survive in other areas. He finally refutes the hypothesis but he apparently did an assumption that crops cannot live anywhere else but near the river. where is the flaw?
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O
[#permalink]
22 Dec 2018, 08:44
1
Expert Reply
The third question is tricky
In general, the assumption is that even if some areas are flooded the crops can be re-located or replanted in other areas unless the lack of the coordination of the central government. In other words, if the gov is strong even the replacement of the crops is doable.
A ,instead, says that the crops cannot be planted in another area government or not assistance. Regardless of its intervention or not. In other words, in A the government (positive or negative action it could have) is not considered.
Instead, we do know from the passage that IF the government was strong and capable the crops could be replanted.
Most scholarship into the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilizati
[#permalink]
05 May 2021, 06:54
1
2
Bookmarks
Most scholarship into the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilization 2,500 years ago has focused on the change in meteorological conditions favorable to subsistence crops. Much of this research, though, has overlooked the role that changing geography, most notably the course of rivers, played. The Coatzacoalcos River, the main river passing through La Venta, could have had notable tributaries diverted as a result of climate change, leading to not only severe flooding in certain areas, but also to a lack of sufficient water for subsistence crops planted near the erstwhile alluvial plain. Such a view, however, fails to account for the resilience of a people capable of transferring crops and moving settlements as need be. What was more likely responsible for the downfall of the Olmec civilization was internal dissent brought on by ecological change, since a leadership unable to control events was likely to be perceived as weak. Without the central governance needed to adapt crop subsistence patterns, the Olmec likely became a collection of feuding clans and thus within a few generations all but disappeared.
1. Which of the following best describes the primary function of the third sentence (“The Coatzacoalcos…plain”)?
A) To call into question information mentioned in the sentence that immediately precedes it. B) To introduce the role meteorological conditions played in the change in crop subsistence patterns. C) To highlight evidence offered up by most scholarship on the disappearance of the Olmec. D) To provide a specific example supporting a hypothesis that differs from that mentioned in the first sentence. E) To indicate how major geographical changes affected the Olmec’s ability to govern effectively.
Consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.
2. Which of the following is an assumption the author of the passage makes?
A) The crops displaced by the flooding of the Coatzacoalcos River would not be viable if replanted in areas unaffected by flooding. B) Adapting crop subsistence involves some level of central governance. C) Feuding clans are not capable of sustaining a viable population in the wake of ecological catastrophe.
3. Which of the following, if true, would best undermine the theory the author of the passage provides for the sudden disappearance of the Olmec?
A) Much of the flooding that resulted came not from any diverted tributaries but by rainfall that intensified over the course of a decade. B) Not all the major subsistence crops were planted along the Coatzacoalcos River. C) Internal dissent was long offered as a theory for the disappearance of the Mayans, but in recent years there is near unanimous agreement that the disappearance was mostly caused by meteorological phenomenon. D) The Olmec split into two groups that warred persistently for several decades before both succumbed to meteorological changes that made settlement of the area virtually impossible. E) The Olmec leadership successfully relocated settlements near one of the new tributaries of Coatzacoalcos, yet years of constant flooding precluded the growth of subsistence crops.
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O
[#permalink]
04 Aug 2021, 14:42
Expert Reply
These are the real reason for the disappearance of the Olmec Empire
Such a view, however, fails to account for the resilience of a people capable of transferring cropsand moving settlements as need be. What was more likelyresponsible for the downfall of the Olmec civilizationwas internal dissent brought on by ecological change, since a leadership unable to control events was likely to be perceived as weak. Without the central governance needed to adapt crop subsistence patterns, the Olmec likely became a collection of feuding clans and within a few generations all but disappeared.
Basically, the reason is: the truth was they failed to transfer crops. The leadership was unable to solve the problem, The unrest took place.
Therefore, the governance was unable and weak
Which of the following, if true, would best undermine the theory the author of the passage provides for the sudden disappearance of the Olmec?
The Olmec leadership successfully relocated settlements near one of the new tributaries of Coatzacoalcos, yet years of constant flooding precluded the growth of subsistence crops.
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O
[#permalink]
29 Aug 2021, 05:24
tapas3016 wrote:
Most scholarship into the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilization 2,500 years ago has focused on the change in meteorological conditions favorable to subsistence crops. Much of this research, though, has overlooked the role that changing geography, most notably the course of rivers, played. The Coatzacoalcos River, the main river passing through La Venta, could have had notable tributaries diverted as a result of climate change, leading to not only severe flooding in certain areas, but also to a lack of sufficient water for subsistence crops planted near the erstwhile alluvial plain. Such a view, however, fails to account for the resilience of a people capable of transferring crops and moving settlements as need be. What was more likely responsible for the downfall of the Olmec civilization was internal dissent brought on by ecological change, since a leadership unable to control events was likely to be perceived as weak. Without the central governance needed to adapt crop subsistence patterns, the Olmec likely became a collection of feuding clans and thus within a few generations all but disappeared.
1. Which of the following best describes the primary function of the third sentence (“The Coatzacoalcos…plain”)?
A) To call into question information mentioned in the sentence that immediately precedes it. B) To introduce the role meteorological conditions played in the change in crop subsistence patterns. C) To highlight evidence offered up by most scholarship on the disappearance of the Olmec. D) To provide a specific example supporting a hypothesis that differs from that mentioned in the first sentence. E) To indicate how major geographical changes affected the Olmec’s ability to govern effectively.
Consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.
2. Which of the following is an assumption the author of the passage makes?
A) The crops displaced by the flooding of the Coatzacoalcos River would not be viable if replanted in areas unaffected by flooding. B) Adapting crop subsistence involves some level of central governance. C) Feuding clans are not capable of sustaining a viable population in the wake of ecological catastrophe.
3. Which of the following, if true, would best undermine the theory the author of the passage provides for the sudden disappearance of the Olmec?
A) Much of the flooding that resulted came not from any diverted tributaries but by rainfall that intensified over the course of a decade. B) Not all the major subsistence crops were planted along the Coatzacoalcos River. C) Internal dissent was long offered as a theory for the disappearance of the Mayans, but in recent years there is near unanimous agreement that the disappearance was mostly caused by meteorological phenomenon. D) The Olmec split into two groups that warred persistently for several decades before both succumbed to meteorological changes that made settlement of the area virtually impossible. E) The Olmec leadership successfully relocated settlements near one of the new tributaries of Coatzacoalcos, yet years of constant flooding precluded the growth of subsistence crops.
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O
[#permalink]
24 Aug 2023, 18:58
2
Summary
Research into the disappearance of olmec civilisation Change in river flow cause draught and flood Also people were inefficient to transfer crops
A1: (E) - The author presumes that it was lack of leadership in the clan that led to disappearance A2: (D) - example was given to refute the scholars research A3: B and C - Author pressures that central governance was required to save the clan and feuding clans, which were remained after the governance collapsed, were incapable of making striving transformation to survive
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O
[#permalink]
14 Jan 2025, 05:57
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
gmatclubot
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]