Re: The Russo-Turkish war (i) _________ Albanians, placing before them the
[#permalink]
30 Apr 2023, 04:00
OE
Rankled, pernicious, latency. The war clearly didn't weaken (enervate) Albanians, since it encourages them to strive for independence. And while some features of the war might have debased them, the prospect of division of their lands didn't do this. However, it might have angered, vexed, or caused bitterness for them, that is, rankled them. The “prospect of a division of their lands” would not be a good thing for the Albanians, so expect a negative word in the second blank. Also, the sentence indicates that “a successful bid for independence” happened a few decades later. Pernicious (greatly destructive, deadly, injurious, or harmful) works well, but evanescent (fleeting; tending to vanish like vapor) and transient (quickly coming into and passing out of existence; transitory) aren't negative enough and both have short-term meanings that conflict with the long time frame indicated by the clue. The Albanian's nationalism surged out— it wasn't already clear (lucid), and whether it was insular before or after doesn't seem to make much of a difference; but if it emerged out of latency, that would explain why it suddenly became a force that could lead to independence.