GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 26Get a Top GRE Score with Target Test Prep
12:00 PM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GRE preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. In fact, more and more Target Test Prep students are scoring 329 and above on the GRE.
Apr 24Get an Extra 30% Off Target Test Prep Plans
08:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Grab 30% off any Target Test Prep GRE plan during our Flash Sale and join Brian and many other students who have used Target Test Prep to score high on the GRE. Just enter the coupon code FLASH30 at checkout to save big.
Apr 25Crafting an Impactful Resume: Balancing Detail with Brevity
10:00 AM EDT
-10:30 AM EDT
Showcase your achievements through impactful storytelling! Get ready for an LIVE session on April 25, Learn how to craft compelling narratives on your resume that resonate with admission committees.
According to Lackmuller’s latest screed, published under the
[#permalink]
15 Mar 2019, 05:43
15 Mar 2019, 05:43
Expert Reply
10
Bookmarks
00:00
Question Stats:
36% (01:25) correct
63% (01:36) wrong based on 173 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
According to Lackmuller’s latest screed, published under the title Why We Can’t Win at Their Game, special interest groups not nominally tied to ecological concerns have become so (i) ______ the process of environmental policymaking that those groups who actually aim to ensure that corporate profit does not trump environmental health have been effectively (ii) ______.
Lackmuller’s contention, however, is (iii) ______ in that it fails to account for the signal achievements environmental groups have effected over the last twenty years — often to the chagrin of big business.
Lackmuller’s contention, however, is (iii) ______ in that it fails to account for the signal achievements environmental groups have effected over the last twenty years — often to the chagrin of big business.
| Blank (i) | Blank (ii) | Blank (iii) |
|---|---|---|
| marginalized in | vindicated | somewhat tentative |
| indebted to | squelched | rarely myopic |
| influential in | lionized | highly misleading |
Re: According to Lackmuller’s latest screed, published under the
[#permalink]
21 Mar 2019, 10:03
21 Mar 2019, 10:03
Expert Reply
As I read, I automatically filled in the blanks with my own words:
The idea of the first blank is that these special interest groups are tied to ecological concerns, and now have a heavy influence in environmental policymaking. C works best for that meaning.
These groups are now so involved in policy making that other groups are being pushed out, or squelched.
The last sentence tells us, though, that this is essentially false. Environmental groups, far from being squelched, have made great gains. Lackmuller's contention wasn't entirely accurate, then, and was actually misleading.
Quote:
According to Lackmuller’s latest screed, published under the title Why We Can’t Win at Their Game, special interest groups not nominally tied to ecological concerns have become so __(mired in)__ the process of environmental policymaking that those groups who actually aim to ensure that corporate profit does not trump environmental health have been effectively _(destroyed)____. Lackmuller’s contention, however, is __(incomplete)___ in that it fails to account for the signal achievements environmental groups have effected over the last twenty years — often to the chagrin of big business.
The idea of the first blank is that these special interest groups are tied to ecological concerns, and now have a heavy influence in environmental policymaking. C works best for that meaning.
These groups are now so involved in policy making that other groups are being pushed out, or squelched.
The last sentence tells us, though, that this is essentially false. Environmental groups, far from being squelched, have made great gains. Lackmuller's contention wasn't entirely accurate, then, and was actually misleading.
Re: According to Lackmullers latest screed, published under the
[#permalink]
14 Apr 2023, 08:23
14 Apr 2023, 08:23
Is "those groups" here corresponds to "interest groups". I am confused
