Re: Writing and words are obviously the most usual and immediate
[#permalink]
16 Jan 2020, 16:31
This is really a beautiful question and to be honest it created a tough time for me as well.
The third blank is difficult to tackle simply because if you do not get the very essence of the sentence AND at the same time you see the big picture probably than not you will go to pick up I and not G as a choice.
The take away from this question is pretty simple and straight yet very crucial: when you find yourself in the wasteland do not try to find a shortcut. Likely, even if there is you, perhaps, will not see it or you are unable to connect the dots. Look at the BIG picture.
Essentially the question is on the balance between these two sides: on one hand, we do have the first part of the sentence
Writing and words are obviously the most usual and immediate way of expressing thought, (i)___ or special, making visible the "not-yet-seen",
Writing and words help us to see the unseen: basically this is what it conveys. The rest of the stimulus is on the oTHER side. We might summarize the entire rest of it with one word: however, to indicate what comes after is in total contrast to the former.
The first blank is obvious and it is banal W and W might show us the banalest or special things as well
but that shouldn't obscure the fact that in the domain of the visual it is the object, the visible,
So, basically WW tell us everything but we have to realize that in the domain of the visual - the visible (of course, what else)
that must be thought of as (ii) ___, irreplaceable and (iii) ___ by writing, words or any other medium.
We have to think the visible as intrinsic - at the very core or essence of our thoughts. This way of thinking CANNOT be substituted and SIMPLIFIED OR IRREDUCIBLE by the media.
Now, H is clearly out of scope. The battle is between irreducible and inscrutable (impossible to understand)
The visible has three characteristics
it is at the very essence of something whatever it is.........
it is cannot be duplicated or replicable
AND cannot be reduced even further because it is intrinsic, like a polynomial cannot be simplified even further such as \((x^2+1)\)
Moreover, the visible is just..visible. Even if we do not understand it fully we incorporate or understand something. inscrutable means that the visible is impenetrable, completely obscure, which per se is an oxymoron and that has no sense.
Regards